×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Cortez Land Use Code Module 1 Review

For staff and advisory committee review

The following document is the first draft of Module 1, which consists of Chapters 1 and 3 of the Cortez Land Use Code. Use the comment tool to add your feedback below. 

Click here to review the redlined versions of the Chapters in Word document formats. Please note that any highlighted text will be updated in the next round of edits. 
File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-
Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.
Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio
Previous
Next
View all

Comments

Close

Add comment

SiteAdmin Jan 5 2024 at 12:27PM on page 15

LS to take another look at this section.
0 replies

SiteAdmin Jan 5 2024 at 12:19PM on page 12

Pat to review
0 replies
in reply to Helen West's comment

SiteAdmin Jan 5 2024 at 12:16PM on page 12

Will change to $300.00
0 replies

SiteAdmin Jan 5 2024 at 12:15PM on page 12

This hasn't been enforced. Bring to joint worksession discussion. Circle back after reviewing Chapter 5- Signs.
0 replies

SiteAdmin Jan 3 2024 at 12:57PM on page 10

same ownership and contiguous lot
0 replies

SiteAdmin Jan 3 2024 at 12:54PM on page 9

All structures (not specific to residential) may be rebuilt as long as they don't exceed the setback and dimensional standards as defined in Chapter 3. Need to think through this section. Leave 50%.
0 replies
in reply to Helen West's comment

SiteAdmin Jan 3 2024 at 12:50PM on page 9

Let's extend to 18 months.
0 replies

SiteAdmin Jan 3 2024 at 12:48PM on page 9

Structure
0 replies

SiteAdmin Jan 3 2024 at 12:47PM on page 9

Structure
0 replies

SiteAdmin Jan 3 2024 at 12:44PM on page 9

Rewrite/merge G and H
0 replies

SiteAdmin Jan 3 2024 at 12:43PM on page 9

Remove "do not enlarge". Add: may be rebuilt as long as the structure does not encroach on the setback.
0 replies

SiteAdmin Jan 3 2024 at 12:38PM on page 6

Make it permissive (may). A property owner could prove their noncorforming status and get a certificate. City would need to track this. LS could create a form for tracking. Move up to top because this could apply to more than just uses.
0 replies

SiteAdmin Jan 3 2024 at 12:30PM on page 6

Consider building out this language and simplifying process; parking is issue here
0 replies

SiteAdmin Jan 3 2024 at 12:29PM on page 6

Change to 12 months
0 replies

SiteAdmin Jan 3 2024 at 12:27PM on page 6

Add #6 back in (currently in nonconforming uses section)
0 replies

SiteAdmin Jan 3 2024 at 12:20PM on page 4

Add period
0 replies

SiteAdmin Jan 3 2024 at 12:19PM on page 4

Edit formatting issue with Bold A
0 replies
in reply to Helen West's comment

SiteAdmin Jan 3 2024 at 12:18PM on page 4

Leave
0 replies

SiteAdmin Jan 3 2024 at 12:15PM on page 1

Ask Pat re: adding language on 1996 version of code.
0 replies

Helen West Jan 2 2024 at 3:43PM on page 15

Question
I know we discussed this, did we want City Council capitalized or lower case?
0 replies

Helen West Jan 2 2024 at 1:50PM on page 13

Suggested Revision
Does not match other monetary values. Should be $500.00
0 replies

Helen West Jan 2 2024 at 1:49PM on page 12

Suggested Revision
Does not match previous monteary amounts. Change all to have NO cents or add .00 here
1 reply

Helen West Jan 2 2024 at 1:45PM on page 11

Comment
I agree. It's understandable but takes time to decipher. Very wordy & confusing
0 replies

Helen West Jan 2 2024 at 1:35PM on page 9

Comment
I'm absolutely fine with 12 months - insurance, etc usually takes a long time. Do we want to keep it to 12 months or shorter/longer? I assume this is industry standard....
1 reply

Helen West Jan 2 2024 at 1:10PM on page 6

Comment
Do we have a system/policy/documents in place to adhere to this?
0 replies

Helen West Jan 2 2024 at 1:01PM on page 4

Question
What does this mean? I know I'm new to government, so it might be standard...Do we need to clarify more for the general public?
1 reply
View all