×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Gallatin Valley Sensitive Lands Plan - WORKING GROUP & STAFF REVIEW

Please provide input on this internal administrative draft by 9/15

How to Review This Document? As indicated on the green bar at the top the document, you can click anywhere on the document to comment and you may click on existing yellow (comment) bubbles to see and reply to comments from others. You can view the Table of Contents to jump around the Chapters or use the search function to find specific sections or topics. 

You do not need to register/sign in to provide comments. However, you will be asked to provide your name and email the first time you comment (if you come back at another time, you'll have to add your name and address again).

The document is provided as spreads. To improve your view, you may need to click the symbol to view the document in Full Screen.

Please Comment by September 15!

Staff, Working Group, and Boards will be reviewing this version prior to public distribution in October. This includes:

  • Bozeman City Commission
  • Gallatin County Commission (study session) | September 7
  • Gallatin County Planning Coordination Committee (study session) | September 12
  • Working Group #5 Meeting (Virtual) will review all comments received | September 18

Then Logan Simpson will update the Plan based on consolidated comments and provide a Public Draft in October. Mark your calendar for our third Community Meeting on October 19!

What's in the Plan:

Chapter 1: Our Planning Process presents an introduction to the planning process, GIS modeling, an overview of public outreach, and introduces the Sensitive Lands Themes.

Chapter 2: Our Community’s Sensitive Lands Values identifies common values across the Study Area based on considerations of a changing Gallatin Valley, results from the public and constituent outreach, values and recommendations of recently adopted policies and plans.

Chapter 3: Our Sensitive Lands outlines data collection, modeling process, and summarizes the outputs of the Sensitive Lands models.

Chapter 4: Our Solutions lists recommendations for new policy and programs, regulatory tools, funding sources, legislative initiatives, and partnerships to guide future implementation to conserve and protect sensitive lands.

Appendices include additional background on public outreach and data review.

If you would like a physical copy of this document, you may download the document directly, or request a printed copy from Jon Henderson. Note that if you download the document as a PDF, you will not be able to see live comments from others and will need to email your PDF to Jon.
File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-
Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.
Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Add comment

Jeremy Call Sep 18 2023 at 5:44PM on page 44

Technical Edit
replace tire with tier
0 replies

Jeremy Call Sep 18 2023 at 5:23PM on page 55

Suggested Revision
Field Verification
0 replies

Chet Sep 18 2023 at 4:54PM on page 25

I think all these summary maps could use a little more infrastructure to help folks identify their location. Could you add major roads? City labels?
0 replies

Chet Sep 18 2023 at 4:42PM on page 37

received at least partial compensation
0 replies

Chet Sep 18 2023 at 4:31PM on page 29

make sure to acknowledge Holly Pippel for this photo.
0 replies

Chet Sep 18 2023 at 2:22PM on page 15

I think 130,00 is much too low. The Flying D easements itself is over 100,000 acres
0 replies

Chet Sep 18 2023 at 2:22PM on page 15

Scale on this graphic is odd.
0 replies

john edwards Sep 18 2023 at 11:10AM on page 61

Suggested Revision
This table says that 197 thousand acres remain in agriculture in the county. But that doesn't jive with other data in this report. Also, the USDA 2017 survey concluded that more like 600,000 acres in the county are in agriculture, either crops or pasture.
0 replies

Lilly McLane Sep 17 2023 at 8:30PM on page 36

Suggested Revision
Include WUI zoning as a type of countywide zoning
0 replies

Lilly McLane Sep 17 2023 at 8:18PM on page 35

Suggested Revision
Add bullet: mitigate flooding and drought.
0 replies

Lilly McLane Sep 17 2023 at 8:06PM on page 28

Suggested Revision
Sensitive lands identified in the watersheds that originate in the Gallatin Range, in the southwest portion of the study area, are particularly important because these watersheds are more “climate resilient” and their protection is critical for sustaining flows in the East Gallatin and Gallatin Rivers.
0 replies

Lilly McLane Sep 17 2023 at 7:54PM on page 28

Suggested Revision
This does not seem worth including?
0 replies

Lilly McLane Sep 17 2023 at 7:52PM on page 28

Suggested Revision
Not sure what this sentence means. Consider: Water quality is accounted for by including mapped lands that provide natural water treatment such as wetlands, floodplains, and riparian areas.
0 replies

Lilly McLane Sep 17 2023 at 7:45PM on page 28

Suggested Revision
"particularly"
0 replies

Lilly McLane Sep 17 2023 at 7:40PM on page 28

Question
Not sure what this bullet means? The floodplain is certainly related to water quality and quantity, and should be included in the model. I am not sure how ditches rely on the floodplain area as a water source?
0 replies

Lilly McLane Sep 17 2023 at 7:37PM on page 28

Suggested Revision
Does not account for data gaps - the model ranking is dependent on the existence of data, and some layers were not equally available across the study area, such as mapped floodplains and channel migration zones.
0 replies

Lilly McLane Sep 17 2023 at 7:27PM on page 18

Suggested Revision
I would be interested to see the reference for the statement that “Groundwater is the sole source of water for the valley for five months out of the year.” While potentially true, it may also be misleading, because the source of groundwater was originally precipitation. It might be helpful to say that the study area lies almost entirely within the Lower Gallatin Watershed, where water supply is primarily snowpack driven, and limited by an average annual precipitation of ##inches. The watershed is closed to new surface water appropriations. For more information, the Gallatin Watershed Sourcebook: A Resident's Guide, is a great resource.
0 replies
in reply to Hannah Rasker's comment

Breece Robertson Sep 17 2023 at 6:48PM on page 35

It would be helpful to list all recommendations on one page with hyperlinks to each section so readers can scan all of them at once and jump to them easily.
0 replies

Breece Robertson Sep 17 2023 at 6:45PM on page 35

Again this term "tools" trips me up here as I think about tools as GIS tools. Are all of these really "tools" or a broad set of recommendations?
0 replies

Breece Robertson Sep 17 2023 at 6:41PM on page 24

It would be helpful to add an example here for non-GIS readers of attributes and features.
0 replies

Lilly McLane Sep 17 2023 at 6:39PM on page 17

Comment
There is a distinction between services water provides versus services sensitive lands provide which related to water. We value water because it is necessary to support fish and wildlife, drinking water, recreation, and irrigation (DNRC and DEQ call these “beneficial uses”). Its ability to do so is based on how the water we have moves through our watershed. Therefore, we value sensitive lands that treat pollution, naturally store water, mitigate floods, and provide greater fish and wildlife habitat and biodiversity. And in doing so, provide resiliency to natural disasters and changing climate.
0 replies

Breece Robertson Sep 17 2023 at 6:39PM on page 23

or created
0 replies

Breece Robertson Sep 17 2023 at 6:38PM on page 21

If the models described below aren't used in this model - or data from those models - you could add here that you did extensive research on difference national to local models to identify best practices and data to incorporate into this effort and then designated in each model section below which contributed to this effort directly or not.
0 replies

Breece Robertson Sep 17 2023 at 6:35PM on page 21

add "or in relation to each other"
0 replies

Breece Robertson Sep 17 2023 at 6:30PM on page 15

Didn't see a definition for conservation easements - unless I missed it. This is a good place to either define for the first time or place a reminder if it's defined elsewhere
0 replies

Breece Robertson Sep 17 2023 at 6:24PM on page 12

to model and visualize...
0 replies

Breece Robertson Sep 17 2023 at 6:22PM on page 12

underly?
0 replies
in reply to Marina Yoshioka's comment

Breece Robertson Sep 17 2023 at 6:21PM on page 12

previous planning "efforts" - not goals - and current issues related to protecting sensitive lands in the area. Agreed to add the other planning efforts or point to an appendix?
0 replies

Breece Robertson Sep 17 2023 at 6:20PM on page 10

Could add more about who the survey was sent to and how many total. Is 590 a good response #?
0 replies
in reply to Marina Yoshioka's comment

Breece Robertson Sep 17 2023 at 6:14PM on page 7

and public education
0 replies

Lilly McLane Sep 17 2023 at 6:10PM on page 17

Suggested Revision
The phrases “healthy fisheries” and “native fish population” seem redundant, consider the term “healthy cold water fishery” which is inclusive of both.
0 replies

Breece Robertson Sep 17 2023 at 6:10PM on page 7

replace "seeks to find" with "provides a road map to"
0 replies

Breece Robertson Sep 17 2023 at 6:07PM on page 7

Comment
"tools" is confusing in this context since the tool could be considered the model itself. Consider dropping the word "tools" and just use recommendations?
0 replies

Breece Robertson Sep 17 2023 at 6:04PM on page 7

Add something about the added threats here?
0 replies
in reply to Bonnie Rice's comment

Breece Robertson Sep 17 2023 at 6:02PM on page 7

to "recommend sensitive lands themes, model criteria and considerations."
0 replies
in reply to Bonnie Rice's comment

Marina Yoshioka Sep 15 2023 at 7:48PM on page 51

Comment
The majority of conflicts occur in residential areas.
0 replies

Marina Yoshioka Sep 15 2023 at 7:44PM on page 46

Question
I am confused why this is listed as a solution when it already exists?
0 replies

Marina Yoshioka Sep 15 2023 at 7:36PM on page 35

Comment
Improve habitat for wildlife. Quality of life is for humans.
0 replies

Marina Yoshioka Sep 15 2023 at 7:33PM on page 26

Comment
Consider explaining why connectivity is important.
0 replies

Marina Yoshioka Sep 15 2023 at 7:32PM on page 26

Comment
As development and human growth increases, wildlife corridors shift in response.
0 replies

Marina Yoshioka Sep 15 2023 at 7:30PM on page 26

Technical Edit
Remove FWP from this last sentence. The public will take the arrow of the corridor very literally. Recommend making the arrow lines more diffused/blurry.
0 replies

Marina Yoshioka Sep 15 2023 at 7:26PM on page 23

Technical Edit
Remove the word "Department"
0 replies

Marina Yoshioka Sep 15 2023 at 7:22PM on page 19

Technical Edit
missing accent.
0 replies

Marina Yoshioka Sep 15 2023 at 7:20PM on page 19

Suggested Revision
capitalize
0 replies

Marina Yoshioka Sep 15 2023 at 7:13PM on page 14

Suggested Revision
This is not true in Montana and the sentence (white, wealthy) will not be well received. Montana sportsmen and small family-owned ranching operations that are not wealthy have contributed greatly to conservation efforts across the state.
0 replies

Marina Yoshioka Sep 15 2023 at 7:11PM on page 14

Suggested Revision
This sentence is strange. Rewrite. "Recreation trends now include activities around the clock, such as night running and climbing. There is also a noticeable increase in off-leash dogs on public lands which contribute to wildlife disturbance along with new technologies such as drones..."
0 replies

Marina Yoshioka Sep 15 2023 at 7:07PM on page 14

Comment
Consider adding the word "development".
0 replies

Marina Yoshioka Sep 15 2023 at 6:50PM on page 104

Technical Edit
Remove this layer. It is incomplete and misleading.
0 replies

Marina Yoshioka Sep 15 2023 at 6:49PM on page 103

Technical Edit
Remove this layer. It is incomplete and misleading.
0 replies

Marina Yoshioka Sep 15 2023 at 6:49PM on page 103

Technical Edit
Remove this layer. It is incomplete and misleading.
0 replies
View all