×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Blueprint Summit DRAFT Plan

Please review the Draft Plan document and provide your comments through the comment tool. 

Thank you for taking time to review the DRAFT Blueprint Summit Comprehensive Plan!

This site will close on January 17.

How to Review? As indicated on the green bar at the top the document, you can click anywhere on the document to comment. You do not need to register/sign in to provide comments. However, you will be asked to provide your name and email the first time you comment (if you come back at another time, you'll have to add your name and address again). 

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.

Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Add comment


"...task force to 'blank' and suppport..." missing word?
replies
worth mentioning the recently-adopted Pay As You Throw recycling ordinances as an example of community commitment to waste reduction
replies
Question
Could you clarify the term "underserved area," as it appears open to interpretation?
replies
Suggested Revision
Suggest adding Goal B, Policy 2.2 of the LBMP: Require that new subdivisions and subdivision exemptions include disturbance envelopes for all lots to limit overall site disturbance and to avoid impacts.

Suggest adding at least parts of Goal B, Policy 3. of the LBMP.

Consider including Goal B, Policy 5 of the LBPC as an implementation action

Suggest adding Goal B, Policy/Action 6 once rephrased.
replies
Suggested Revision
Suggest adding Goal B, Policy/Action 1 if the 2009 TMPC. Suggest staff discusses rephasing of this policy.

Land uses in the Rural Area (see the Land Use Map) should be generally consistent with a goal of preserving the existing rural landscape and consistent with activities expected within a rural location (e.g., low density residential development, natural resource uses such as agriculture, forestry, and mining).
replies
in reply to Tucker 's comment
Comment
of Goal A
replies
in reply to Tucker 's comment
Suggested Revision
Sorry I meant Policy/Action 3 and also, Policy/Action 4 from the 2009 LBMP
replies
in reply to Tucker 's comment
Suggested Revision
The County and Town of Silverthorne should work cooperatively to develop intergovernmental agreements that establish the following: 3.1 3.2 A requirement that some portion of TDRs accompany all future annexations that include higher densities or more intense land uses than allowed in the Rural Area. The designation by the Town of Silverthorne of an urban growth boundary and TDR receiving areas within the Urban/Silverthorne Area, clearly defining the areas where the Town plans future annexations and anticipates growth.
replies
Suggested Revision
Suggest adding Policy/Action 2 from the LBMP.
replies
Suggested Revision
Suggest adding a policy that mirrors the Rural Areas language in the TMMP. "Where development is allowed by right on properties that allow one unit per 20 acres, utilize clustered housing, maintain open space, avoid sensitive environmental areas, and avoid visual impacts so that the open mountain character is protected.
replies
Suggested Revision
Suggest adding an implementation action to either explore developing a guidance document for development that protect viewsheds or amend the LUDC to add viewshed protection regs.
replies
in reply to SiteAdmin's comment
Suggested Revision
Suggest adding a policy "integrate playgrounds/community gathering spaces within all existing and proposed residential neighborhoods."
replies
Suggested Revision
I don't love this policy bc it's quite vague. Suggest deletion or rephrasing.
replies
Comment
Suggest adding an implementation action, the LUDC doesn't currently offer development incentives for infill development/adaptive reuse. Perhaps, the County should consider doing so.
replies
Comment
See comment above regarding Policy LU-2.2, the County pretty much never allows this type of development by right, consider doing so with an amendment to the LUDC.
replies
Suggested Revision
Suggest adding an implementation task associated with this policy:

"Amend the LUDC to create a zoning designation for mixed use"

The reasoning behind this is that there are so many PUDs in Summit County because in part, there little opportunity for mixed use zoning in the standard zoning designations.
replies
Suggested Revision
suggest another bullet point "Proximity to bus stops and the County Recreational Path"
replies
Technical Edit
replace ag with agricultural
replies
Suggested Revision
suggest moving away from urban/rural language, maybe "when determining if a location can accommodate an increase in residential or commercial density, the planning commission shall consider the following factors"
replies
Comment
This policy does a nice job of replacing locate 'urban development in Urban Areas' language in the TMPC basin plan.
replies
Comment
phenomenal photo!
replies
in reply to SiteAdmin's comment
Increase recycling options for #5 and #6. Explain importance to everyone and where it's going (Breck create = short demo station).
replies
Increase composting for locals and visitors
replies
WeLL or LEED certification requirements for new and existing buildings.
replies
Because we need more diverse businesses in town instead of 10 t-shirt stores that sell the same thing, and will be able to contribute to local housing needs and the community.
replies
What defines small business?
Small business resources and help for year-round stability.
replies
Appreciate the updates, and the additional key areas because it's diverse.
replies
Focus density in urban areas. (Clear, concise and easy to understand for decision-makers and developers alike.)
replies
Provide demographics.
replies
How can SSD be aligned as partner/access point to various services?
replies
Look at an overall group/organization of childcare services/shared services for efficiencies/shared funding.
replies
Student voices.
replies
Add playgrounds/parks for all the children in neighborhoods (i.e. Wildernest).
replies
Serve the Heeney area with sewer.
replies
Diversity of businesses:
Asian supermarket
Innovation hub for new business ideas
replies
Supporting bus routes to commuter communities has been a huge step forward.
replies
Pursue land swaps for contiguous natural areas.
replies
Or USFS managing federal lands.
replies
Wherever "USFS" or "Forest Service lands" is mentioned, its "National Forest lands managed by the "US Forest Service."
replies
Encourage green building and move forward towards net zero building construction.
replies
Look at impact fees, or pay into accounts for projects that include things like heat tape, heated driveways, or hot tubs.
replies
Prioritize Bear Avenue programming and cut down on feeding wildlife as a cultural norm.
replies
Preserve wetlands.
replies
Need to quantify environmentally damaging issues (through illustrations in code).
replies
Add disturbance envelopes crafted to industrial sites.
Environmentally friendly
Minimize driveways
Minimize off-site wetland mitigation or within basin
replies
Include more language as related to development review.
replies
Expand plastics recycling.
replies
"Minimize" development impacts.
replies
Improve traffic flow, safety, and cell service, for commuters from Park County.
replies
Electrify the County's fleet.
replies