×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Blueprint Summit Draft_V3 For Staff Review

Please review the Revised Draft 3 document and provide your comments through the comment tool.

Thank you for taking time to review the REVISED DRAFT 3 of the Blueprint Summit Comprehensive Plan!

This site will close on March 21 at 5PM.

How to Review? As indicated on the green bar at the top the document, you can click anywhere on the document to comment. You do not need to register/sign in to provide comments. However, you will be asked to provide your name and email the first time you comment (if you come back at another time, you'll have to add your name and address again). You can view the Table of Contents in the drop-down menu below to navigate to individual chapters or use the search function to find specific sections or topics. Please note that there are questions throughout the document (noted by the ?'s at the left edge of the document) to provide specific feedback on key concepts. 
File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-
Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%
Comment Drag

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.
Document is loading Loading Glossary…
AI Search Full Document

AI Tools

Hide

Welcome to your personal document assistant, powered by AI.

You can ask me questions and I will review the document to provide answers with page references for you. Please be patient, it might take a second and note that I might not always get it right - if you have questions it's easy to check the page sources or contact staff to clarify.

Start with a general question and then follow up with additional questions to narrow the focus of the response if needed.

What would you like to know?

Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Add comment

suzanne Feb 28 2025 at 4:36PM on page 35

Comment
The current UBMP includes a section on Reestablishing Lot Lines - resubdividing lots that previously went through a Lot Line Vacation prior to 2000 that don't have a restrictive covenant. I think Summit went to court for a case that had an issue which is why it's in the Master Plan. Suggest keeping or revising the Policy we have?
replies

suzanne Feb 28 2025 at 4:16PM on page 39

Suggested Revision
or from the Joint Upper Blue TDR Bank.
replies

Brandon Feb 26 2025 at 10:43AM on page 48

Comment
Although previously the County was considering giving the Senior a portion of the County Commons land for Senior Housing, at this time the County has shifted to providing a parcel of land to the Seniors at Lake Hill. There are too many uncertainties regarding what future uses we will need at County Commons to provide a Senior facility there at this time.
replies

Brandon Feb 26 2025 at 10:40AM on page 47

Comment
The county is currently working with Staying in Summit to provide that group with a parcel at Lake Hill so I am not sure if want to say provide these facilities near the Senior Center when that is not our currently plan.
replies

Brandon Feb 26 2025 at 10:15AM on page 63

Suggested Revision
Not sure what this is trying to say. Maybe change from "ensure" to "encourage" or "require".
replies

Brandon Feb 26 2025 at 10:11AM on page 63

Suggested Revision
We already do this. Change to "continue"
replies

Brandon Feb 26 2025 at 10:11AM on page 63

Suggested Revision
We have already implemented fee waivers and expedited permitting for workforce housing projects.
replies

Brandon Feb 26 2025 at 10:09AM on page 63

Suggested Revision
We already monitor the number and location of ADU's and deed restricted units so lets change this to "Continue monitoring...."
replies

Lina Lesmes Feb 24 2025 at 3:47PM on page 62

Suggested Revision
Remove 'a steady'. Just say 'the demand for'.
I suggest this because the words 'a steady' seems to add weight to the STR half of the sentence.
replies
in reply to Brandon's comment

Lina Lesmes Feb 24 2025 at 3:29PM on page 61

Comment
Yes, I agree with this suggestion
replies
in reply to Lina Lesmes's comment

Lina Lesmes Feb 24 2025 at 12:34PM on page 60

Suggested Revision
Sorry, I put this comment in the wrong section, this is mean to go under the 'relevant plans' section.
replies

Lina Lesmes Feb 24 2025 at 12:33PM on page 60

Suggested Revision
Remove the word 'the' before Prop 123
replies

Lina Lesmes Feb 24 2025 at 12:33PM on page 60

Comment
ADD: The 2021 Summit County Housing Plan is being revised, with an updated Plan intended to be drafted in 2025.
replies

Lina Lesmes Feb 24 2025 at 12:13PM on page 48

Comment
Why isn't there anything around transportation in this section? Frisco is also working on micro transit, and the County owns the Frisco Transit Center, which is an important hub.
replies

Lina Lesmes Feb 24 2025 at 12:11PM on page 46

Suggested Revision
Add a higher density LUD for the Lake Hill Neighborhood
replies

Lina Lesmes Feb 24 2025 at 12:07PM on page 47

Suggested Revision
Support the Town of Frisco in the effort to improve I70 Exit 203.
replies

Lina Lesmes Feb 24 2025 at 12:03PM on page 47

Suggested Revision
Frisco Sanitation District. Include word 'district'.
replies
in reply to Lina Lesmes's comment

Lina Lesmes Feb 24 2025 at 11:51AM on page 45

Comment
Sorry, I meant to comment on 3.8.
replies

Lina Lesmes Feb 24 2025 at 11:49AM on page 45

Technical Edit
This is the same as 2.7. This is in here twice.
replies

Lina Lesmes Feb 24 2025 at 11:47AM on page 42

Suggested Revision
Ensure land use designation for Lake Hill is shown as High Density Residential. Allow for future workforce housing at the County Commons.
replies

Lina Lesmes Feb 24 2025 at 11:38AM on page 38

Suggested Revision
Sustain the partnership with the Town of Breckenridge for the development of workforce housing.
replies

Lina Lesmes Feb 24 2025 at 11:37AM on page 37

Comment
Ensure the Wayside Lodge LUD is Higher Density and Mixed Use Neighborhoods, although the plan is to annex it to the TOB
replies

Lina Lesmes Feb 24 2025 at 11:32AM on page 25

Suggested Revision
Support the Town's efforts regarding the needed improvements to I70 Exit 205 and the Highway 9 corridor?
replies

Lina Lesmes Feb 24 2025 at 11:15AM on page 30

Suggested Revision
Seek partnerships with the Town of Dillon, the Dillon Valley District, and other agencies in the area to construct workforce housing.
replies

Lina Lesmes Feb 24 2025 at 11:13AM on page 29

Suggested Revision
Workforce housing may be developed on County owned property near the WWT plant in Summit Cove. Please consider land use designation that allows that for that property.
replies

Lina Lesmes Feb 24 2025 at 11:09AM on page 17

Suggested Revision
The USFS admin site is correctly labeled public lands, but should it be higher density and mixed use since that's its highest and best use?
replies

Lina Lesmes Feb 24 2025 at 11:07AM on page 17

Suggested Revision
The DNR Kennel property should not be labeled Open Space as a future land use designation. This property will have housing. I suggest at least the Neighborhoods land use designation. This is also true of the parcel at the entrance to Tiger Run, which is owned by the County and we might locate housing there as well.
replies

Lina Lesmes Feb 24 2025 at 11:05AM on page 17

Suggested Revision
The Alpensee Parcels should not be mixed use but Higher Density and Mixed Use Neighborhoods or the Neighborhoods land use designation
replies

Lina Lesmes Feb 24 2025 at 11:02AM on page 17

Suggested Revision
Lake Hill should have a Higher Density and Mixed Use Neighborhoods Land Use Designation, not community Facilities. Same for the County Commons where there are areas where workforce housing can be accommodated.
replies

Brandon Feb 24 2025 at 10:15AM on page 62

I am not sure how the County could work with utility providers to prioritize workforce housing. Each utility provider has its own rules and regulations. Typically, so long as they have the ability to serve the unit they will serve the unit whether it is workforce or market rate.
replies

Brandon Feb 24 2025 at 10:08AM on page 62

Comment
The County currently offers the following incentives to anyone looking to build an ADU, whether it is a small or large development. -Development fee waivers for any unit that is deed restricted.
Eligible for the ADU Asssitance Program which provides grants up to 25% of the cost of construction to build an ADU.
The County has also already implemented expedited permitting for all workforce housing projects by allowing Site Plans to be approved through an Administrative Approval rather than going to Planning Commission. Planning, can you clarify if this Site Plan Admin approval was also approved for mixed projects where a portion of the project is workforce housing?
replies

Brandon Feb 24 2025 at 9:45AM on page 61

Comment
I would like to see this be broader.
Maybe: "Collaborate with municipalities, the USFS, the School District and private property owners to acquire additional land through purchases, land trades, or ground leases"
replies

Brandon Feb 24 2025 at 9:40AM on page 61

Comment
Can we reword this policy to:
"Continue to market the ADU stock plans and ADU Assistance Program to homeowners to encourage them to build ADU on their property." The County is not building ADU's on private property.
replies

Brandon Feb 24 2025 at 9:37AM on page 60

Comment
Is it worth discussing here that that County has implemented Short Term Rental regulations and Housing staff believes these regulations are starting to have an impact. While it is difficult to directly correlate the STR regulations to home prices, there has been a recent flattening of home prices in the County and even some slight decreases. High interest rates are also likely a contributing factor to this.
replies
View all