×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Blueprint Summit, Revised Draft Plan v3 for Planning Commission Review

Please review the Revised Draft document and provide your comments through the comment tool.

Thank you for taking time to review the REVISED DRAFT v3 of the Blueprint Summit Comprehensive Plan!

This site will close on March 20 at 5PM.

How to Review? As indicated on the green bar at the top the document, you can click anywhere on the document to comment. You do not need to register/sign in to provide comments. However, you will be asked to provide your name and email the first time you comment (if you come back at another time, you'll have to add your name and address again). You can view the Table of Contents in the drop-down menu below to navigate to individual chapters or use the search function to find specific sections or topics. Please note that there are questions throughout the document (noted by the ?'s at the left edge of the document) to provide specific feedback on key concepts. 

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%
Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Commenting is closed for this document.


Comment
Revise my Lodge by the Blue comment - the A1 parcel surrounding Lodge by the Blue should be Rural Residential
replies
Comment
Lodge by the Blue aka Ruby Placer had very little density assigned by historical records. Recommend changing to rural residential or similar
replies
Comment
This parcel should become open space
replies
Comment
Wakefield Ranch is not open space. Recommend changing this to "Rural" designation
replies
A rec path is definitely a high priority. Understanding the difficulty of getting a grade separated path, we must consider that winter use would be difficult with a grade separated path. This would serve only as a summer seasonal grade separated path because snow plow operations would bury the path in the winter. A year round option is preferred of at all possible especially considering the effort it will take to get any rec path.
replies
Comment
Rather than Enhance the path to Park County, this should read extend the path as no path currently exists to Park County.
replies
Comment
There's many who would argue that senior housing is not needed. Altitude is not someplace seniors look to relocate, and those already within the community have hosuing.
replies
Encourage town to add a road connecting town to county commons to create a less traveled route rather than US9.
replies
Suggested Revision
employee or affordable?
replies
Suggested Revision
high school is in upper blue/breck section.

Middle school would be relevant here.
replies
Suggested Revision
workforce or affordable?
replies
Suggested Revision
Just employee housing, or affordable community housing?
replies
comma
replies
Suggested Revision
Work with CDOT to create safe pullout lanes for officer's gulch trails and climbing.
replies
Suggested Revision
If this stays in the plan, mark it on the maps.
replies
Suggested Revision
Will the move to electric trucks improve this as the engine breaks won't be loud? Time (and current state goals) may solve this one.
replies
If they're looking to establish a sustainable community, (as in a community that remains over time) might consider adding affordable permanent housing.
replies
Suggested Revision
in Cooper-2 in like 4 different ways.
replies
Suggested Revision
There are all kind of redundant. Could combine to like 4-5 total.
replies
add "s" = areas
replies
comma
replies
Suggested Revision
This would be a good place (both land use and paragraph) for "workforce housing" meaning housing built by employers for employees.
replies
Suggested Revision
Why isn't mining remediation important along swan, tiger, snake, and the other two rivers (basins) damaged by dredge and hydraulic gold/silver mining?
replies
Good word, could be utilized in Upper Blue/Silverthorn section.
replies
red
replies
Suggested Revision
Work with CDOT to create pull-outs and other winter vehicle safety elements.
replies
Suggested Revision
Consider rules allowing detachable or smallest bike motors. (If not full sale, then for people living on moonstone/boareas, and or/people with limiting medical conditions)
replies
Suggested Revision
Work with town to extend waterlines to existing developments.
replies
Suggested Revision
1) Add bus access up Moonstone and Shortcut rds.
2) work with mapping companies (apple & google) to deprioritize moonstone and shortcut as a viable to Boreas.
3) Limit STRs on "black diamond" roads such as Breck Heights neighborhood.
replies
Suggested Revision
If affordable and workforce housing are technical and specific terms, consider defining them according to the code. Otherwise, just call it affordable, or community housing.
replies
Suggested Revision
Use technical term.
replies
Suggested Revision
NBD but Breck is abbreviated in the Section head, but not in the policy titles. Consider making consistent.
replies
Comment
Density should be counted at least as a portion of a single family equivalent. Affordable housing should not be completely exempt from the cap.
replies
*community housing
replies
Suggested Revision
if affordable workforce housing is a technical term, use it. Otherwise, affordable community housing.
replies
Comment
Thank you for all your work putting this together!
replies
Question
Has there been a recent study of all of the mines that currently can feed down into Lake Dillion? Has an action plan been put into place to mitigate when a mine "belches"? Are there resources set aside specifically for this to enable clean up and environmental impact studies, or a plan and resources in conjunction with another organization? This will be especially relevant for new and existing housing that is built near impacted streams and waterways.
replies
Comment
List of organizations and funding sources
replies
Comment
The largest issue for businesses currently is that there is not enough available housing. Businesses have been closing because they cannot find qualified staff, even paying $30/hr. Small businesses simply can't afford to pay for housing for staff, the burden is too great on business with less than 10 employees.
replies
Comment
The "Class V" raft put in is the only thing keeping overcrowding at bay below the dam. Consider leaving well enough alone to avoid needs for road and infrastructure improvements that will be needed following raft / kayak put-in improvements
replies
Comment
We need to revisit who qualifies for what type of deed restricted unit, and there are couples and individuals who exceed current limits, but come nowhere close in income to be able to afford non deed restricted housing.
replies
Is this a technical term? Can we change that?
replies
Comment
What are the estimated costs to implement these, and where are the projected revenue sources coming from?
replies
red
replies
Suggested Revision
*basin
replies
Comment
A detailed listing of how much funding is provided by each organization, that is involved in each area, would be helpful in understanding cost of implementation to the county.
replies
Suggested Revision
*affordable "community" housing.
replies
Suggested Revision
Clearly mark trailheads and parking to keep hikers off private property.
replies
missing "s" at the end of town.
replies
*ES
replies