×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Cortez Land Use Code - Chapter 5 Site Developemnt Standards v1

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.

Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Add comment


in reply to RM's comment
The City should adopt a noise ordinance in the municipal code to address this. That ordinance could mimic state statute or establish something more strict and be referenced here.
replies
in reply to RM's comment
moved to chapter 6 to combine with other review authority descriptions
replies
in reply to RM's comment
Also, wondering why we took out the section on the Forestry Advisory Board....
replies
in reply to RM's comment
Sean has been counting both sides
replies
leave this out for now
replies
clarify that it is exempt from buffers
replies
County
replies
add table of when buffering is required
replies
if
replies
tree lawns are responsibility of property owner but if city has to clean up no fee assessed
replies
in reply to RM's comment
we may want to tie this to the violations section. Either move to violations and reference or keep here and make note in violations section about this exception
replies
ask Crieghton
replies
Remove item J
replies
reduce to 50% and include images of different levels of coverage for joint work session discussion
replies
Cheryl sent list
replies
reference vision clearance and state that fences may be allowed in vision clearance no taller than 4' with permeability (from existing code language)
replies
SFD - 2 spaces (allow to be tandem) - check ADU standards, might have included language along those lines (clarify that garage counts as one space
SFA - 1.5
MF - 1.5
ADU - 1 space (double check?)
Cottage Cluster - 1.5
replies
formatting
replies
Comment
ND: This chapter applies to all new development, re-development, new use, or development of a site.
replies
we have had complaints about loud trucks. Is the LUC the right place to have regulations about that or should that be elsewhere?
replies
huh?
replies
is this is conformance with state standards? we have different standards for commercial vs. residential
replies
City Clerk?
replies
Are there age guidelines?
replies
delete extra space
replies
without penalty- what does this mean?
replies
Would like to discuss this a bit. Didn't we have a sunset clause somewhere?
replies
To some extent, when it comes to banners over the highway we require them to go through a process which includes CDOT permission...
replies
remove extra space
replies
WHat about LED lighting?
replies
which face? Should it be the largest face?
replies
remove "and" here...
replies
There has been a lot of discussion about what constitutes a wetland. Would like to discuss....
replies
in reply to RM's comment
Oh never mind I see it below...
replies
How do we define "Local Wetland?"
replies
How does this affect our other landscaping standards?
replies
Planning Director or City Planner?
replies
Should code enforcement process kick in?
replies
This seems like a lot. Consider lowering?
replies
Is it Planning Director or City Planner? I think previously this question came up and we decided on City Planner?
replies
I am double checking with Parks and Rec.... is this what's in the current code?
replies
new streetscapes?
replies
following:
replies
[construction] design standards....
replies
How big can this individual lot be?
replies
Suggested Revision
We need to add the current code wording Section 5.02 (j) (3a-d)
replies
I'm double checking with Creighton about Landscaping and also about P&R being the right entity....
replies
Add another use to the back to show buffering from front and other use
replies
consider a table to describe
replies
build on this to describe where you find the buffer information
replies