×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Henderson Strong Planned Land Uses

Review the Land Use Plan and Categories before March 6

In anticipation of the March 6 meeting to workshop the Land Use Plan and Land Use Categories, please review and add any questions, comments, or suggestions to the maps and category descriptions below. This will help guide and focus the discussion. Some questions to consider while reviewing:

  • What Land Use descriptions need to be revised?
  • Do the permitted zoning categories need to be adjusted?
  • What specific map changes need to be considered?
  • What policies or tools should the City consider to reinforce this Land Use Plan?
File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.

Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Add comment


Suggested Revision
Look at ways to increase this category in areas that make sense to make it easier for hdr to come in by right as opposed to public hearing (land use/zone change) to increase means for affordable and attainable housing.
replies
Comment
Correction to the comment about DH. That comment should refer to CH instead, which is no longer allowed in Title 19.
replies
Suggested Revision
We may need to remove DH as a conforming zoning district from all the PLU categories since we no longer allow zone changes to it.
replies
in reply to AWR's comment
oops see it below.
replies
Suggested Revision
May be worth the effort to clean up this odd double LU in this area of the Falls @ LLV
replies
Suggested Revision
Consider changing LU of HAAS Phase 3 to something more suitable adjacent to residential.
replies
in reply to AWR's comment
i found NC land use below. oops.
replies
Comment
Intrigued by adding CN here (and moving NC as a LU category). like to hear what the staff thinks....
replies
Comment
Need to discuss removing NC more.
replies
Comment
we should limit industrial to the two lowest impactful ones.
replies
Comment
looks like cut and paste typo here.
replies
Suggested Revision
this language on NC is tricky. If we are going to allow CN zoning we should just allow it.
replies
Suggested Revision
Is there really any NT1? May be worth removing and just using LDR
replies
Suggested Revision
PS zoning should be permitted in all LU categories.
replies
Suggested Revision
Need to find a way to separate these industrial districts. May be more of a zoning issue and not LU
replies
Suggested Revision
Add RM 16 to HDR, too.
replies
Suggested Revision
there is a two parcel site owned by Odyssey that doesn't make sense for NT land use now and should consider NC or COM (may be too small for COM)
replies
Suggested Revision
LU along Via Nobila should now support the HAAS and MOSAIC projects that will bring heavy truck traffic to this area.
replies
Suggested Revision
Need to take overall look at LU patterns based on approved/constructed projects. This entire covered in the WH LUP needs to be comprehensively updated.
replies