×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Park County DSR Update | BCC Adoption Draft

Round 1 Amendments | Adoption Draft V2 for BCC Hearing

This is the BCC adoption draft of the Round 1 edits for the Park County Development Standards and Regulations ("DSR") Update. This draft reflects changes recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission following their public hearing on November 20, 2024.

The first round of proposed updates to the DSR is the subject of this notice and involves, generally, formatting and administrative changes including, but not limited to: modernizing the format of the document (e.g., automatic page numbering, linked Table of Contents, etc.); updates to Chapter I (Administration); a preliminary update of Chapter II (Definitions); updates to portions of the regulations that are directly impacted by recent statutory language changes (e.g., family exemptions, subdivision fencing, etc.); and a first-round appendices clean-up. Bringing the regulations into alignment with state and federal law is a primary goal of this effort. This first round of amendments is intended to address “low hanging fruit” issues during a short window of time. During the past several years, P&Z staff, the P&Z Commission and Board identified several key areas of the DSR requiring quick attention during this round of amendments. Recommended language and changes are reflected in all but Chapter V of this first-round draft. No changes to the official zoning map of the County are proposed during this round.

The Park County Board of County Commissioners ("Board") will hold a special meeting to conduct a public hearing on the proposed first-round updates/amendments to the 2015 Park County Development Standards and Regulations (“DSR”) on  Monday, January 27th at 1:15 pm in the Grizzly Room of the Cody Library, 1500 Heart Mountain Street, Cody, WY.

 

What Chapters are being revised in Round 1 Amendments?

The scope of Round 1 edits is to align the DSR with statutory requirements and federal regulations, and to address minimal administrative changes and “low hanging fruit” . During the past several years, P&Z staff, the P&Z Commission and Board identified several key areas of the DSR requiring quick attention during this round of amendments. 

The following Chapters of the DSR are being revised in Round 1:

  • Chapter 1: Administration
  • Chapter 2: Definitions
  • Chapter 3: Subdivisions
  • Chapter 4: Zoning Regulations 
  • Appendices

(Chapter 5 has been excluded from the PDF because no edits are proposed to that chapter with Round 1)

 

What am I Reviewing?

Both a redline showing in text changes and a "clean" version showing the resulting proposed text are available for review. You can use the drop-down menu on the top left-hand side of the document viewer to view and comment on the redline or "clean" version of the document. You can also use the "Table of Contents" drop down to jump between chapters. 

In each section, you will see blue text boxes explaining the proposed edits to each section.

*Please note that all sections with proposed edits will undergo further revision and reorganization in Round 2. The intent of Round 1 edits is to provide the County with a set of regulations addressing low-hanging fruit and federal/state requirements. Round 2 will focus on ensuring the regulations function for Park County within that legal framework.*

 

How to Review This Document

As indicated on the green bar at the top of the document, you can click anywhere to comment. You may view the Table of Contents or use the search function to find specific sections or topics. When commenting, you will be asked to provide your contact information to verify the comment is not from a bot. If you would like to view your comments later, you must register with an email account and be logged in when you make your comments; otherwise, you will not be able to see them at a later date. 

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.

Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Add comment


Question
Why would mailed notice requirements to individual landowners be exempted? More information to individual landowners should be preferred rather than favoring developers.
replies
Suggested Revision
suggest "per principal housing unit," It is too vague as currently worded.
replies
Suggested Revision
include omitted access easements
replies
Suggested Revision
In addition to the listing in the local newspaper, the notice of intent should be sent via certified mail to adjacent property owners and any landowner holding easements relating to the land to be subdivided. In the past, the County Engineer has informally advised applicants to speak with neighbors but his verbal and written recommendations have been ignored by applicants. This could avoid delays, appeals, and extensive disputes later in the process.
replies
Comment
I am glad to see a budding interest in controlling light pollution. I would like the statement of purpose to include protecting wildlife from the disorienting impacts of outdoor lighting. Many of the worst offenders, in terms of bothering neighbors, are in our communities. Lighting was one of the major issues in the controversy over the new temple, and the community, and their concerns, were steamrollered because of not having any "dark skies" ordinances in place.
replies
Comment
I'm not sure if this is in the purview of this planning document, but it seems to me like an effort needs to be made towards identifying areas of the county that the public would deem acceptable for utility scale wind or solar development, and areas that would generate major public opposition. We've seen controversies of this sort recently, and they have caused strife in our communities. At the very least, Park County land that has commercial windfarm potential should be identified. That would get us out ahead of any surprises.
replies
Suggested Revision
This is the type of wording that should also be applied to the case of net-metered solar systems.
replies
A distinction needs to be made throughout this document separating net-metered solar and wind private electricity generation from commercial (for profit) or industrial uses. Changes to the State net-meter rules are afoot that will eventually allow broader net-metered generation, opening opportunities for communities to create their own small scale solar arrays to power municipal buildings, schools, and the like. In the horizon of this document, the need and opportunity for on-site electric generation (solar and wind) as well as private battery storage systems, will only increase, so I suggest that these distinctions be defined & included from the get-go.
replies
Suggested Revision
need to make a distinction in permitting requirements between residential or agricultural solar and industrial scale.
replies
Technical Edit
that there ARE any rights----just a grammar correction
replies
Question
what about folks who collect antique farm equipment in their yard?
replies
Suggested Revision
Not clear what a "solar energy facility" is. Addressing WEFs , a distinction is made between industrial and homeowner use. This should also be made clear with solar installations. Rooftop solar for property owner use is one thing, a community owned solar array is another thing, and a commercial or industrial scale installation is another. Wyoming statue makes these distinctions clear with net meter rules that are moving towards accomodating municipal arrays.
replies
Suggested Revision
I don't know what a "nude model studio" is. Would this preclude an establishment such as the Cody Country Art League, or NWC, or The Polar Plant from offering a life drawing class (where art student draw from a live nude model) to the community?
replies
Technical Edit
Strike "thoroughfare" and replace with "road." Strike "building" and replace with "lot."
replies
Technical Edit
strike "street" and replace with "road." Street isn't a defined term.
replies
Technical Edit
Consider rephrasing the description of a road to:

Road: Any vehicle route, improved or unimproved, that is: (1) an existing federal, state, county, or vehicular route of public record; or (2) shown upon a plat approved and recorded in the land records of the Clerk’s office; or (3) an access easement, or right-of-way, shown upon a survey or plat recorded in the land records of the Clerk’s office; or (4) is approved by other official action by the Board of County Commissioners.

Such rephrasing clarifies each sub-definition as separate and unique. It adds federal roads. It lastly adds and includes vehicular rights-of-way, in addition to easements, as ‘roads.’
replies
Comment
adjacent property owners should be notified in writing that a variance has been requested and the projected "known" impacts to their property to protect the property rights of the adjacent property owners and provide them time to ask for relief.
replies
Suggested Revision
add the for a complete sentence
replies
Suggested Revision
continued improper use of notice should be corrected
replies
Suggested Revision
shall provide notice of a public hearing
replies
Comment
poorly written and should include an expected cost or at least specify the costs, cost to print the public notice of public hearings, court proceedings etc. Also the description of resident needs to be clarified. Is a resident someone who is here for a few weeks to vote and then doesn't return to the state until the same time next year?
replies
Suggested Revision
For GR-Meeteetse: Commercial Uses and Industrial Uses should be more line with GR-Powell. When zoning is undertaken, there should be a Meeteetse Local designation where the "E" designation would also be applicable.
replies
Technical Edit
Should say Packing/outfitting
replies
Technical Edit
This should be "e." and the paragraphs that follow will need to be corrected accordingly.
replies
Question
I would add HVAC, should it be added?
replies
Question
See a previous comment, this is mechanical energy being converted into electrical energy. Do you need this or can it be combined into the previous section?
replies
Question
is photovoltaic not considered electric generation? Only mechanical?
replies
Suggested Revision
Since Lodging Taxes are collected on 'Short-term' rentals of less than 30 days, anything over that is considered 'Long-term' and no taxes are collected. If you wish to 'redefine' Long-term rentals as six (6) months or more, what term will you be using for the month to month or 3 month or 4 month lengths of term? This is not consistent use of either term. State use considers 'Short-term' less than 30 days.
replies
Suggested Revision
Since Lodging Taxes are collected on 'Short-term' rentals of less than 30 days, anything over that is considered 'Long-term' and no taxes are collected. If you wish to 'redefine' Long-term rentals as six (6) months or more, what term will you be using for the month to month or 3 month or 4 month lengths of term?
replies