×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Draft Imagine Alamosa Comprehensive Plan - Community Advisory Committee Review

Review and comment on the Draft Plan!

The public input gathered and your expertise has helped us develop the Draft Imagine Alamosa Comprehensive Plan. Now, we’d like your feedback related to:

  • Chapter 1: Introduction 

  • Chapter 2: Plan Foundation

  • Chapter 3: Agricultural Identity 

  • Chapter 4: Diverse Economy

  • Chapter 5: Healthy Environments 

  • Chapter 6: Natural Landscape

  • Chapter 7: Future Land Use Plan

  • Chapter 8 Implementation (coming soon)

  • Appendices (coming soon)

Your input at this stage will help us refine and finalize the Draft Plan.

How to give input? As indicated on the green bar at the top the document, you can click anywhere on the document to comment. You do not need to register/sign in to provide comments. However, you will be asked to provide your name and email the first time you comment (if you come back at another time, you'll have to add your name and address again). Select "Summary" to select the specific chapter # that you want to comment on.
File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-
Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%
Comment Drag

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.
Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Summary Full Document

Summary

All Hide

Want to leave a comment?

Expand

Chapter 1: Introduction

Provide feedback on Chapter 1: Introduction! This chapter includes sections... Purpose of the Plan, How to Use the Plan, Relevant Plans,and the Legal Precendent and State Statute Requirements. 

Read More Jump to Page

Chapter 2: Plan Foundation

Provide feedback on Chapter 2: Plan Foundation! This chapter includes the sections... Community Engagement Process, Visioning, and Water Integration.

Read More Jump to Page

Chapter 3: Agricultural Identity

Provide feedback on Chapter 3: Agricultural Identity! This chapter includes the sections... Plan Element Overview, Agricultural Identity Overview, Water Considerations, Key Considerations, Goals and Strategies, and Supporting Land Uses

Read More Jump to Page

Chapter 4: Diverse Economy

Provide feedback on Chapter 4: Diverse Economy! This chapters includes the sections... Diverse Economy Overview, Water Considerations, Key Considerations, Goals and Strategies, and Supporting Land Uses.

Read More Jump to Page

Chapter 5: Healthy Environments

Provide feedback on Chapter 5: Healthy Environments! This chapter includes the sections... Healthy Environments Overview, Water Considerations, Key Considerations, Goals and Strategies, and Supporting Land Uses.

Read More Jump to Page

Chapter 6: Natural Landscapes

Provide feedback on Chapter 6: Natural Landscapes! This chapter includes the sections... Natural Landscapes Overview, Water Considerations, Key Considerations, Goals and Strategies, and Supporting Land Uses.

Read More Jump to Page

Chapter 7: Future Land Use Plan

Provide feedback on Chapter 7: Future Land Use Plan! This chapters includes the sections...Overview, Future Land Use Categories, Future Land Use Map, Focus Areas, Solar Siting Considerations, and Water Augmentation Considerations.

Read More Jump to Page
Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Add comment

Greg Goodwin May 21 2025 at 1:42PM on page 30

Suggested Revision
Instead of specifying minimum lot size, consider a density per 40 acres or 160 acres. If a farm house was subdivided off of a farm circle, this might only be able to be 5 acres without including some of the farm ground. That would be a reasonable subdivision but wouldn't make the acreage requirement. The Agriculture and Rural Preservation and Prime Agriculture areas take up a lot of areas of the County. I don't think it is wise for the County to restrict minor subdivisions in these areas. There is a lot of land that is non-farm ground sitting next to productive farm ground that makes sense to subdivide. Restricting subdivisions on this land takes away personal property rights and could be the best use of the property. If these map categories become official, there will be very limited subdivision of land and that does nothing to help with our housing shortage. I also think that the lot densities should be looked at based on the power and water overlays. Places that can provide both of these criteria should be considered for a higher density.

Greg Goodwin May 21 2025 at 1:22PM on page 32

Suggested Revision
This zoning needs to be revised. This shows the prime farming area and it is really a small lot residential area. The future use of this area should remain suburban rural density that allows for lots in the 2-3 acre range.

SiteAdmin May 20 2025 at 12:50PM on page 31

Comment
Revisit: "supplementary to ag"

CAC Mtg #7 May 20 2025 at 12:46PM on page 31

Technical Edit
remove extra bullet

SiteAdmin May 20 2025 at 12:46PM on page 31

extra bullet point

SiteAdmin May 20 2025 at 12:44PM on page 31

Comment
Density/acre metric rather than min lot size. (concern over flexibility for ag lands)

avg lot sizing?

CAC Mtg #7 May 20 2025 at 12:02PM on page 33

Question
Could provide metrics of water count per unit type, so they can do water planning in the future?

CAC Mtg #7 May 20 2025 at 12:02PM on page 32

Comment
These sections should have an introduction to help caveat the intent of the Focus Areas. This is especially important to help understanding/visualization of the buildout graphics. Note that these are diagrammatic/conceptual only.

Donna Wehe May 19 2025 at 2:31PM on page 36

I think the Farm Park is in East Alamosa? It might be listed here as a partner?

Donna Wehe May 19 2025 at 2:15PM on page 16

Solar and other large renewable or tourist (RV) additions are wonderful, but we need to be sure the county is looking at sustainability and mitigation responsibilities. If any of these need to be decommissioned for any reason, does the county have the ability to hold the original permit owners responsible?

Donna May 19 2025 at 6:28AM on page 16

The plan looks great, very comprehensive
View all