×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Park County DRAFT Energy Uses | TAG REVIEW

TAG REVIEW ONLY - Not for public distribution

To participate, navigate through the chapters using the on‑screen tools and click on the specific locations where you would like to leave a comment, so your input is tied to a particular use/section. Share your thoughts, questions, or suggested changes in the comment box, keeping remarks focused, respectful, and related to the content on that page so Staff, Planning and Zoning Commission, and the Board of County Commissioners can clearly understand and consider the feedback.
File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-
Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.
Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio

Comments

View all Cancel

Add comment

MM Mar 6 2026 at 2:15PM on page 2

Comment
Fencing impedes the ability of wildlife to move across the landscape. Wildlife friendly fencing may be appropriate.

MM Mar 6 2026 at 2:12PM on page 1

Comment
If these activities are proposed in existing agriculture lands (disturbed-row crop) then those lands have already been disturbed. As this falls under "small scale" community solar, they shouldn't be allowed or should move to their own use under agriculture? They may require transmission lines over other private lands. If in the rural areas including rural remote and rangeland, fencing and disturbances have proven to cause issues for wildlife. Do these align with the LUP.

MM Feb 25 2026 at 3:56PM on page 1

Comment
Where did 100 acres come from? In some areas that may be a significant disturbance.

MM Feb 23 2026 at 2:56PM on page 2

Comment
This may be covered under the compliance w industry standards or not? Specific colors and pattern requirement ...this may not be needed? Or add to the list of applicable standards the Wyoming reference in section 2.b.?
From WYDOT: link

mary Feb 23 2026 at 9:39AM on page 1

Any structures not associated with rooftop or personal uses should have to go through permitting. I agree with avoiding certain areas. We don't want to open this up to widespread facilities being placed all over the County on our public landsl. Does this use align with the LUP?

mary Feb 23 2026 at 9:36AM on page 1

Comment
I have issues with the potential of these "small scale" projects and locations. We don't want to open this up for these to be scattered all over public lands because they aren't prohibited or restricted. How do they get connected to the local power grid? There may be appropriate places for these so any should have to go through a permit process. Does this align with the LUP?
View all