×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Park County DSR Update - March Planning Area Workshop

Provide comments on your planning area use table!

Park County held eight (8) open houses in January, February and early March to gather public input on zoning district types and use allowances. We also gathered input through an online questionnaire/survey. The information that follows reflects preliminary input from members of the public who participated in the open houses and online questionnaire. We would like to know how closely the preliminary maps and use tables reflect general public opinions. After this exercise, we will factor this input into our deep-dive.

How to give input? As indicated on the green bar at the top the document, you can click anywhere on the document to comment. You do not need to register/sign in to provide comments. However, you will be asked to provide your name and email the first time you comment (if you come back at another time, you'll have to add your name and address again). Select "guided tour" button on the bottom of the PDF window to see what is included for each planning area and select "summary" to select your planning area when you are ready to comment! The "table of contents" drop down also allows you to quickly jump to your planning area. 

The level of review by use are determined by the following symbols:

-  = Do not allow this use
PH = Maximum Regulation/Restriction (e.g. Public Hearings before the P&Z and BOCC)
ST = Medium Regulation/Restriction (e.g. P&Z Department Review with Special Standards)
A* = Minimal Regulation/Restriction (e.g. P&Z Department Review for use)
A = Allow without use permit and/or staff review (permit for structure may be required)
Blank Cell = Not enough input. We need you to help us fill in the blank!

 
File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-
Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%
Comment Drag

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.
Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Summary Guided Tour Full Document

Summary

All Hide

Introduction

Expand

Clark

Provide feedback on the Clark Planning Area!

Read More Jump to Page

Cody Local

Provide feedback on Cody Local!

Read More Jump to Page

Cody-Powell Rural

Provide feedback on Cody-Powell Rural!

Read More Jump to Page

Lower South Fork

Provide feedback on Lower South Fork!

Read More Jump to Page

Meeteetse

Provide feedback on Meeteetse!

Read More Jump to Page

Middle South Fork

Provide feedback on Middle South Fork!

Read More Jump to Page

North Fork

Provide feedback on North Fork!

Read More Jump to Page

Powell Local

Provide feedback on Powell Local!

Read More Jump to Page

Sage Creek

Provide feedback on the Sage Creek Planning Area!

Read More Jump to Page

Sunlight

Provide feedback on Sunlight!

Read More Jump to Page

Upper Clark's Fork

Provide feedback on Upper Clark's Fork!

Read More Jump to Page

Upper South Fork

Provide feedback on Upper South Fork!

Read More Jump to Page

Guided Tour

Hide
Take a quick tour to see how you can leave comments on your planning area's draft use table!
Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Add comment

Curt Bales Apr 24 2025 at 4:51PM on page 60

Comment
I have waterlines to supply my cattle with water

Curt Bales Apr 24 2025 at 4:49PM on page 60

Comment
So i could not remove and sell rocks for riprap or decoration landscape.

Curt Bales Apr 24 2025 at 4:46PM on page 59

Comment
I couldn't breed my dog and sell the puppies

Curt Bales Apr 24 2025 at 4:43PM on page 59

Comment
What are you going to do about existing Cemetaries and schools?

Curt Bales Apr 24 2025 at 4:42PM on page 59

Comment
No fire station?

Curt Bales Apr 24 2025 at 4:38PM on page 30

Comment
County already has a gravel pit, why not landowners. Don't tread on my property rights

Curt Bales Apr 24 2025 at 4:36PM on page 30

Comment
I think you are taking way too many rights away from landowners

Curt Bales Apr 24 2025 at 4:34PM on page 29

Comment
With 10-20 acres you should be able board animals. Someone's horse?

Curt Bales Apr 24 2025 at 4:32PM on page 29

Comment
What happens to the 4-H kid who wants an animal for fair?

Curt Bales Apr 24 2025 at 4:30PM on page 29

Comment
What if game and fish needs a hunting check point or weed and pest needs an office of sorts?

Curt Bales Apr 24 2025 at 4:28PM on page 29

Comment
i don't think you should restrict residential uses

Curt Bales Apr 24 2025 at 4:25PM on page 29

Comment
I don't think you should restrict any agricultural uses in the middle southfork

Curt Bales Apr 24 2025 at 4:20PM on page 20

Comment
You should not restrict any recreational opportunities

Curt Bales Apr 24 2025 at 4:18PM on page 19

Comment
You should not restrict any community uses

Curt Bales Apr 24 2025 at 4:17PM on page 19

Comment
You should not restrict any residential uses.

Curt Bales Apr 24 2025 at 4:14PM on page 19

Comment
I think you should not restrict any agricultural uses in the lower southfork. If i have property in a Eastate residential with 10-20 acres and you are sayinf my kids can not even have a feedlot to have a 4-H animal.

Curt Bales Apr 24 2025 at 4:06PM on page 5

Comment
no gravel pits on my property ? you are taking way too many rights aw.ay from owners

Curt Bales Apr 24 2025 at 4:03PM on page 5

Comment
So if i understand this there could be no solar or wind energy facilities. what if i want a solar panel for my use?
in reply to John's comment

John Apr 23 2025 at 4:49PM on page 45

Suggested Revision
Again, the comment pertains to both "Community Residential" and Residential-5.
in reply to John's comment

John Apr 23 2025 at 4:47PM on page 44

Suggested Revision
This pertains to "Community Residential" and should require a minimum lot size of 3 acres.
in reply to John's comment

John Apr 23 2025 at 4:46PM on page 44

Suggested Revision
I miss read the zoning category as "commercial" vs. "Community" and want to amend my comment to required a minimum lot size of 3 acres.

John Apr 23 2025 at 4:34PM on page 44

Question
Will existing large lots ... acres above the minimum prescribed in the new zoning designation ... be required to increase lots size for sale/subdivision to meet the minimum for the new zoning calcification.? For example, if there is a 10 acre parcel that is zoned Commercial Residential, will future sales/subdivision be required to meet the minimum lots size for that classification?

John Apr 23 2025 at 4:29PM on page 44

Question
Will existing lot sizes below the those prescribed in proposed zoning designation be grandfathered in perpetuity. For example is a current two acre lot in a new Commercial Residential zone be honored for resale?

John Apr 23 2025 at 4:23PM on page 45

Suggested Revision
All Extraction Uses in any zoned area should require PH review.

John Apr 23 2025 at 4:22PM on page 45

Suggested Revision
Storage Shipping Containers should be "A*" review for Residentail-5 and Estate Residential zoned areas.

John Apr 23 2025 at 4:19PM on page 45

Suggested Revision
Recreational Center, Outdoor should not be allow in "Commercial Residential" and "Residential-5" zoned areas ... "-" ..., and should be "A*" in Estate Residential zoned areas.

John Apr 23 2025 at 4:16PM on page 45

Suggested Revision
Riding Arena in Residential-5 zoned areas should require ST review.

John Apr 23 2025 at 4:14PM on page 44

Suggested Revision
Commercial Lodging (Small Scale) in Residential - 5 zone areas should require "A*" review/reporting.

John Apr 23 2025 at 4:11PM on page 44

Suggested Revision
Meeting Halls in Residential-5 zoned areas should ST review.

John Apr 23 2025 at 4:09PM on page 44

Suggested Revision
Mixed Use Building in Commercial Residential zoned areas should be limited to 3 - 5 acre lots.

John Apr 23 2025 at 4:07PM on page 44

Suggested Revision
The ADUs should be limited to one per residence. Multiple ADU development on larger lots such as Estate Residential or General Rural should be limited to one per 5 acres and should be require "ST" review.

John Apr 23 2025 at 3:59PM on page 44

Suggested Revision
For the entire Sage Creek PA, the "Residential" use in the "Commercial and Residential" zoning category should be a minimum of 3 - 5 acre lots size.

Curt Bales Apr 22 2025 at 8:43AM on page 4

Comment
FFA project would have to go p&z

Curt Bales Apr 22 2025 at 8:41AM on page 2

Comment
Looks like a ffa member raising a steer or animal to slaughter would need approval as a feedlot

Tim Feathers Apr 14 2025 at 10:01AM on page 39

Comment
Not appropriate for Residential 5

Tim Feathers Apr 14 2025 at 9:56AM on page 40

Comment
No utility or infrastructure in residential or agricultural areas. Exception for personal use of wind and solar.

Tim Feathers Apr 14 2025 at 9:55AM on page 40

Comment
No extraction in residential areas, allowed in industrial areas, ST in all others

Tim Feathers Apr 14 2025 at 9:53AM on page 40

Comment
No heavy industry in residential areas.

Tim Feathers Apr 14 2025 at 9:52AM on page 40

Comment
Recreation/entertainment uses not appropriate for residential 5, these are residential areas, not commercial areas.

Tim Feathers Apr 14 2025 at 9:50AM on page 39

Comment
Commerical uses not appropriate for Residential 5

Tim Feathers Apr 14 2025 at 9:49AM on page 39

Comment
Commercial lodging large scale is not suitable for residential areas and should not be allowed.

Tim Feathers Apr 14 2025 at 9:47AM on page 39

Comment
All residential areas should be for single family dwellings, no trailer parks, no town homes, apartments, duplexes, triplexes, or dormitories. Employee housing should be for agricultural employees only.

Tim Feathers Apr 14 2025 at 9:37AM on page 40

Comment
Large commercial wind turbines should not be allowed anywhere except remote areas away from any occupation. Small residential/farm use should be allowed with permitting and height and density restrictions.

Mike Howard Apr 13 2025 at 11:41AM on page 10

Suggested Revision
Wind energy facilities should be prohibited in all zones. The negative impact on site lines, property values, wildlife, noise, and other factors important to maintaining the character of Cody far outweigh any benefits of harnessing the local wind.

Mike Howard Apr 13 2025 at 11:38AM on page 10

Suggested Revision
Given the proximity of general rural and residential zoned areas in the Cody Local planning area, all utility + infrastructure uses of general rural should at least require public hearing (PH designation).

Mike Howard Apr 13 2025 at 11:36AM on page 10

Suggested Revision
There are several areas in Cody where residentially zoned areas are adjacent to areas zoned general rural. Given the potential impacts of heavy industry on these residential areas, heavy industry use should be designated PH rather than ST.

Jenny Apr 10 2025 at 1:23PM on page 8

Suggested Revision
Can we make it more clear in the description that this does not include private use wind utilities? Same comment applies for Solar. Could we have a separate small/residential scale solar/wind category?

Jake DeWilde Apr 10 2025 at 12:38PM on page 35

Suggested Revision
"A"

Jake DeWilde Apr 10 2025 at 12:38PM on page 35

Suggested Revision
"A"

Jake DeWilde Apr 10 2025 at 12:37PM on page 35

Suggested Revision
"A"
View all