Re-Imagining Bergstrom Park

Jeff Webb Jun 4 2025 at 1:06PM on page 8

This concept has a diversity of attractions and I think would really be successful in bringing a wide variety of visitors for repeat visits

Jeff Webb Jun 4 2025 at 1:05PM on page 8

In concept 2 & 3 this corner is strong with good connections to the adjacent ped crossing (the primary crossing in DT) as well as future bike routes at this location. This helps to weave the park more seamlessly into our 'urban' fabric and is a strategy that should be utilized in any future design

Jeff Webb Jun 4 2025 at 1:03PM on page 7

I like acknowledging our natural/environmental history (reference to Fountain Creek headwaters) along side of our human history at the park. In W.P. we are much more united by the environment we share, the common views of Pikes Peak, etc. than we are by most other things in our community.

Jeff Webb Jun 4 2025 at 1:01PM on page 7

Fun, unique feature that would be a hit with kids......if it's natural turf obviously there could be some maintenance challenges but there are solutions.

Jeff Webb Jun 4 2025 at 1:01PM on page 7

Without the parking it is amazing how much more impact the park has. More space, more programming, more design flexibility. No parking is a huge win for the park visitors and solving the perception that there isn't enough parking in DT is not the responsibility of Bergstrom Park!

Jeff Webb Jun 4 2025 at 12:59PM on page 8

Veg. screening of 24 is helpful from a noise/pollution standpoint but I think having some view corridors so that drivers can see how cool the new park is would be important for attracting new visitors. It may also have some benefits for perceived safety as well....so my suggestion is just be strategic with the location of screening.

Jeff Webb Jun 4 2025 at 12:57PM on page 8

Internal walkways to get visitors off of 24 (even by a few feet) is a great idea

Jeff Webb Jun 4 2025 at 12:56PM on page 6

An iconic and visible design element like the water tower could be very helpful to attract drivers to the park.

Jeff Webb Jun 4 2025 at 12:55PM on page 6

Keeping the existing "historic" buildings has some serious trade-offs for the design and function of the park. I think it is essential to weave history into the design and programming of the park, but keeping these buildings does limit the usefulness of the park for anyone less interested in the train history. Together these building comprise maybe a third of the site.....if they are kept I think it is really important that they add in a meaningful way to the use, function, attractiveness of the park. I don't know if they achieve these goals (L.S. should make this assessment), but I know for sure keeping them simply because there is social media chatter would be bad process and be a disservice the true potential of Bergstrom

Jeff Webb Jun 4 2025 at 12:49PM on page 6

Please, no parking at the park! There is plenty of public parking within a block or two and it would be a misuse of the small and valuable real estate to use it for something as energy killing as static parking. If visitors parked a block or two away to visit, it would be a net benefit to nearby businesses as well as the additional foot traffic would allow folks to discover new businesses

Kelly Jun 4 2025 at 10:18AM on page 6

how does this fit with the history of WP? It seems out of place

Kelly Jun 4 2025 at 10:17AM on page 6

this structure feels more rustic while the shade structure and roundhouse are very modern. I don't like the incongruity.

Kelly Jun 4 2025 at 10:17AM on page 6

this doesn't feel accessible to those of us using walkers or chairs, but I love the appearance

Kelly Jun 4 2025 at 10:15AM on page 6

feels too modern and like it doesn't fit in with our community -- also, a steeper roof would be more functional

Kelly Jun 4 2025 at 10:15AM on page 6

love the look of this structu

Kelly Jun 4 2025 at 10:14AM on page 9

much better than above, but still disappointing

Kelly Jun 4 2025 at 10:13AM on page 9

I hate that the view is completely blocked

Kelly Jun 4 2025 at 10:13AM on page 8

it doesn't look at all natural

Kelly Jun 4 2025 at 10:12AM on page 7

love the style

Kelly Jun 4 2025 at 10:12AM on page 7

a more steeply slanted roof would both look better and function better

Kelly Jun 4 2025 at 10:11AM on page 7

Please use native plants rather than this type of garden. Also railroad ties look terrible and fall apart as they age.

Kelly Jun 4 2025 at 10:10AM on page 8

Native plants would be better. I love the picnic area with the steeply slanted shade structure. The amphitheater looks inaccessible to anyone using a walker or chair, and like it would be extremely uncomfortable.

Beverly Jun 4 2025 at 8:40AM on page 1

I would like to see the Historical Society's proposal - their perspective is valuable as WP seeks to maintain its heritage. Proposal #1 may be a good compromise, but it would be good to see all proposals. Thank you.

Jerry Penland Jun 2 2025 at 9:18PM on page 8

Taking the best from all the concepts will result in a strong draw and a solid asset for the city.

Jerry Penland Jun 2 2025 at 9:16PM on page 4

At the public forum, we heard about 93 TAVA House parking spaces? No one could tell us exactly where these 93 spaces were. No matter where these spaces are envisioned, taxpayer money should play no part in providing TAVA House parking spaces.

Jerry Penland Jun 2 2025 at 9:14PM on page 2

The parking area should remain. Anything added here that attracts kids could be a problem. Without a "child proof" barrier to Hwy 24, all it takes is for normal childs play to result in a Hwy 24 disaster.

Jerry Penland Jun 2 2025 at 9:11PM on page 1

The entry from Hwy 24 should be from the western side, not S. Park Street. There is already a deceleration lane that with a slight modification would be less expensive and more appropriate. If the entry stays the same, S. Park Street, every square foot required that will be taken from Bergstrom Park should be given back from TAVA house land. This is our land, not TAVA house land...reimbursement in kind is unacceptable.

Evan Baileys Jun 2 2025 at 8:43PM on page 6

I like how heavily this concept favors the train theme.

Evan Baileys Jun 2 2025 at 8:42PM on page 6

I like keeping the restroom building. It helps draw attention to the site.

Stephanie Cassada May 30 2025 at 8:54PM on page 6

These are all beautiful and thoughtful concepts. I prefer Concept 1 , it is designed with all ages in mind and the style goes nicely with the Tava House.

Paula Dugger May 30 2025 at 4:16PM on page 1

It is disappointing that the Ute Pass Historical Society's concept has not been included in the proposed designs. The UPHS concept will achieve much needed updates while keeping the historical element of the park intact. Let us not lose the rich history of our area under the guise of "progress".

Mike & Kathryn Lockwood May 30 2025 at 10:56AM on page 6

This design seems to be the one to keep both the depot and the baggage building, which we like and most likely would meet with Bert Bergstrom's idea. Would like to see more in the way of sculptures and historic flavor. Interesting that we don't see the Ute Pass Historical Society concept to comment on even though it was on display at the public meeting.

Pat May 30 2025 at 9:08AM on page 6

It would be a travesty to remove the old trees in the park. I believe they were planted by Bert Bergstrom who donated the land for the park, and they are a living symbol of our town's namesake- Woodland Park. These trees can outlive all of us if they are honored and remain.

Mike Bryant May 29 2025 at 12:57PM on page 6

Of the three concepts depicted, I think Concept 1 at least seems consistent with Bert Bergstrom's wishes, but I am concerned that the Historical Society's concept is not included on this web page for consideration. The park should both reflect our heritage as a western mountain town and should be consistent with the architecture of main street, which has an Old West/Mountain town vibe to it. I really like the UPHS concept of enclosing the train depot and adding a police substation. Perhaps rather than making it into a museum, though, the enclosed depot building could become a visitor information center with small exhibits on the history of WP. I think a permanent police presence in the heart of downtown would both deter crime and better integrate the police department into the fabric of the community. Ideally, Bergstrom Park will become the link between main street and the new Tava development

Fredi Beck May 29 2025 at 12:01PM on page 8

Where is the UPHS's rendering? All of these are too modern, too clinical.

Christine May 29 2025 at 11:38AM on page 9

The more you build the less you will see of PP.

Christine May 29 2025 at 11:35AM on page 6

I like this concept 1 best. I would like to see some of the UPHS concept integrated into this. For example, adding some boots and spurs to the design would cover some of the rodeo history of our area. I like the idea of offering up the shelter for a substation for our Law enforcement and Emergency personnel. I do like that the parking lot and amphitheater have been redesigned. I also like the railroad history added to the park.

Jan May 29 2025 at 11:01AM on page 1

"Where is the concept presented by The Ute Pass Historical Society"????

Linda Allred May 29 2025 at 9:32AM on page 6

Why isn't the Ute Pass Historical Society Plan shown?

I do like the historic approach shown in this concept. I would like to see this plan moving forward

Pat May 28 2025 at 9:37PM on page 8

This is my least favorite concept. But I do appreciate this sharing of ideas and thank you all for your efforts.

Pat May 28 2025 at 9:34PM on page 7

I am excited that we will finally see the historic depot building put into use. I do not want to lose the existing restroom building. It can be spruced up. The railroad tie terrace is lovely and works with the railroad theme. I think I saw a railroad tie bench somewhere that would also work.

Pat May 28 2025 at 9:27PM on page 6

I love the way this concept embraces the historical theme of the Midland Railway. The log climbing structure can celebrate our timber history. The train play station and water tower are perfect accents to the Train Station vibe. It would be very cool to use the Interpretive Kiosk to see how the train station would have looked back in history.

Pat May 28 2025 at 9:21PM on page 3

Great analysis of the site. I love the idea of creating a buffer highway noise.

Steve Plutt May 28 2025 at 7:04PM on page 9

I favor none of these, but do favor the historical societies concept that isn't shown here.

Warning message

Re-Imagining Bergstrom Park

Comments

Commenting is closed for this document.